USE-CASE GUIDES

Best LLM API for summarization & data extraction

Summarization and extraction are typically input-heavy (a long document in) and output-light (a short summary or a structured field out), so the input rate drives cost. Budget-tier models, cheapest input first.

Summarization and structured-extraction tasks share a pattern: a long input and a comparatively short, structured output. That makes them input-price-sensitive in the same way high-volume classification tasks are. This list filters to budget-tier models sorted by input price ascending.

ℹ️How this list is built: Filtered to the budget tier, sorted by input price ascending.
11 models
Model Provider Input /1M Output /1M Context
Mistral $0.15 $0.60 Not published
Meta (via Together AI) $0.18 $0.59 1M tokens
OpenAI $0.20 $1.20 ~1.05M tokens
Google $0.25 $1.50 Not published
Meta (via Together AI) $0.27 $0.85 ~1.05M tokens
DeepSeek $0.30 $1.20 1M tokens
Amazon $0.30 $2.50 1M tokens
Alibaba $0.40 $1.60 1M tokens
Mistral $0.50 $1.50 Not published
Anthropic $1.00 $5.00 200K tokens
xAI $1.00 $2.00 256K tokens

We don't benchmark task-specific quality — this shortlist is built from verified price and published context window only. Use it to narrow candidates by cost, then evaluate output quality yourself.

See all use cases →

Frequently asked questions

The filter and sort are the same because the cost pattern overlaps — both are input-heavy, output-light workloads. This page exists separately so summarization and extraction are easy to find on their own.

Yes — if your documents regularly exceed a model's context window, you'll need to chunk them, which adds complexity and can hurt summary quality across chunk boundaries. Check the context column, not just price.

Yes — we track verified price and context window only, not extraction accuracy. For fields that matter, validate a sample of outputs against ground truth before relying on any model at scale.